Multi-Class Electronic Waveform Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Classification Performances of Machine Learning Methods

Authors

  • Celalettin Arslan Ataturk University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering, 25100 - Erzurum, Türkiye
  • Volkan Kaya Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Department of Computer Engineering

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30855/ais.2025.08.01.05

Keywords:

Electronic waveforms, signal classification, Machine learning

Abstract

Electronic waveform classification is a critical area of ​​research for separating and identifying signals from different sources. This study aims to classify visual representations of electronic waveform signals using classical machine learning methods. Using a dataset consisting of 7,000 images of 7 different electronic waveforms, the classification performance of 10 different machine learning algorithms was compared. In the study, the dataset was divided into training and test sets and all models were trained using the same feature set and evaluated according to classification metrics. The results revealed that Extra Trees and Random Forest algorithms were the most successful classifiers with 98.57% and 98.50% accuracy respectively. On the other hand, Naive Bayes and AdaBoost algorithms have been found to be inadequate for this type of data due to their low accuracy values. The findings show that bagging-based ensemble learning approaches achieve high accuracy in electronic waveform classification tasks and support the effectiveness of classical machine learning methods in the field of signal analysis. In this context, the study makes a significant contribution to the literature on the classification of electronic waveform datasets based on time-frequency images.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2025

How to Cite

Arslan, C., & Kaya, V. (2025). Multi-Class Electronic Waveform Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Classification Performances of Machine Learning Methods. Artificial Intelligence Studies, 8(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.30855/ais.2025.08.01.05

Issue

Section

Articles